Zoli's Blog - Latest Comments in Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Gagandeep Singh — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:40:53 -0000

I feel PM 2.0 is evolving in pretty good shape and various interesting posts about it especially by Andrew Filev and Zoli give a good insight into the ideas. But it is a fact that it needs to become a standard and there needs to be a structure to the concept so that it can be formalized. Some sort of guidelines(like PMI has for the PM 1.0 - infact also applicable to PM 2.0) or simply some extension to the PM 1.0 guidelines especially in the execution and communication methodologies is the key here. It must finally find its way either in the PMI or the PRINCE2 add ons or say extensions.

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Steve — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:30:58 -0000

I definitely think that the whole point of PM 2.0 is collaboration and sharing information. It's related to Web 2.0 right? Social networking and online project management tools. It has already changed the way we conduct business!

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Andrew Filev — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:10:32 -0000

Hi Zoli and readers,

That's a great intro into the panel. I look forward to it.

For those readers of Zoli's blog, who won't be able to visit our panel here's my humble definition of the term: http://www.wrike.com/projec...
You can also find there a lot of content on various aspects of the trend.

See you.

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Christine — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:32:07 -0000

Well i think that PM 1.0 was all about planning, reporting and it served Management but did not help actual Project Execution. And My expectation of PM 2.0 is that They all basically agree that it’s about using online collaboration tools.

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Bruce P. Henry — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:32:56 -0000

Zoli, I am looking forward to meeting you at the Office 2.0 conference.

I think the question of what was wrong with PM 1.0 and how does PM 2.0 attempt to address those things is going to generate a fantastic discussion! I'm SO looking forward to it.

Slightly more detail in my post about Project Management 2.0 @ Office 2.0

Cheers!

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

PM Hut — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:08:04 -0000

I have read several interpretations of Project Management 2.0. 2 things:

- No real standard in the concept
- They all basically agree that it's about using online collaboration tools.

Maybe someone, somewhere, should really say exactly what PM 2.0 is and others will follow.

Re: Project Management 2.0 – What’s Wrong With 1.0?

Steve Ireland — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:30:11 -0000

Nicely put Zoli. When compared to project governance, project execution requires a lot more coordination and a different working context; regardless of the methodology used.

In order to track to that pretty MS Project promise the detailed tasks, unexpected problems, new priorities, design changes, technology refreshes, maintenance and dynamics of people all need to be stewarded to become "non-events". ...lets not forget the teams that are working on more than one (unrelated) project at a time too!

Three is good company. A good leader aligns people and processes with agile, easy to use tools that focus on activity management and execution.